Introduction

There are a number of SaaS platforms that offers a range of tools for startups and small businesses, including contract drafting and management. The platforms provide users with customizable templates, drag-and-drop editing, and e-signature capabilities to streamline the contract drafting process. They also include tools for managing the contract lifecycle, such as automated reminders and analytics to help users track the status of their contracts.

In summary, these contract drafting SaaS vendors offer a range of features and tools to help users streamline the contract drafting and management process. Each platform has its own strengths and weaknesses, so it’s important for businesses to carefully evaluate their needs and choose a platform that best suits their requirements. By using these tools, businesses can save time and resources while ensuring that their contracts are accurate, legally compliant, and effectively protect their interests.

SaaS Contract Writing Providers

Examples of Contract Writing Providers

PandaDoc

PandaDoc is a cloud-based document management platform that offers a range of features for drafting, sending, and tracking contracts. With PandaDoc, users can create professional-looking contracts quickly and easily, thanks to the platform’s pre-built templates, drag-and-drop editor, and customizable fields. The platform also includes e-signature capabilities, which allow users to sign and execute contracts electronically, streamlining the signing process. In addition, PandaDoc integrates with popular business tools, such as Salesforce and Hubspot, to help users manage their contracts within their existing workflow. One downside of PandaDoc is that it can be more expensive compared to other contract drafting tools.

Formstack

Formstack is a web-based form builder that also offers contract drafting capabilities. The platform’s intuitive interface makes it easy to create custom contracts from scratch or use pre-built templates. Formstack also provides features such as workflow automation, which allows users to automate tasks such as approval processes and reminders. Additionally, Formstack includes e-signature capabilities that enable users to sign and execute contracts electronically. The platform’s integration capabilities also allow users to connect to popular business tools, such as Salesforce and PayPal, to streamline their workflows. One downside of Formstack is that its contract drafting capabilities are relatively basic compared to other tools.

You can easily use a third-party API to integrate your documents with your preferred invoicing software or payment provider. Or, you can create a form that collects patient information and then use your preferred CRM to store it once it’s returned by the customer.

If you want to send documents to multiple people and have them automatically sent back to you when they’re signed, Formstack Documents is the best tool for your needs. It will keep track of all your signed forms, and automatically update your CRM with the new information.

Thomson Reuters HighQ

Thomson Reuters HighQ is a cloud-based platform designed for legal professionals that provides features for contract drafting and management. With HighQ, users can create and edit custom contracts, share them with other users, and track their status in real-time. The platform’s user-friendly interface, which includes drag-and-drop functionality, makes it easy to create and edit contracts. HighQ also includes powerful workflow management tools, allowing users to set up custom approval workflows and automated notifications. Additionally, the platform offers advanced security features that help ensure that contracts are stored and shared securely. One downside of HighQ is that it can be more expensive than other contract drafting tools, and may be better suited for larger organizations.

The company’s flagship contract management solution is powered by AI-assisted document automation to help you streamline and automate the creation of legal contracts, resulting in a more efficient and effective way to serve your clients. The solution is built on a secure, cloud-based platform that’s easily accessible to any team member across your organization.

Thomas Reuters HighQ is built on a secure, cloud-based platform that’s easily accessible to any team member across your organization.

Documate

Documate is a cloud-based document automation platform that includes features for contract drafting. With Documate, users can create custom contracts using pre-built templates, conditional logic, and data integrations. The platform also includes e-signature capabilities and features for document management and automation, such as custom approval workflows and automated notifications. Documate’s interface is user-friendly and intuitive, with a drag-and-drop editor and real-time previews to make it easy to create and edit contracts. One downside of Documate is that it can be more expensive compared to other contract drafting tools.

ClauseBase

ClauseBase is a cloud-based contract automation platform that provides users with a wide range of features for contract drafting and management. With ClauseBase, users can create custom contracts using pre-built templates and a drag-and-drop editor. The platform also includes features for document automation, such as conditional logic and data integrations, as well as e-signature capabilities. Additionally, ClauseBase offers advanced security features, including user permissions and audit trails. One downside of ClauseBase is that it can be more complex compared to other contract drafting tools, which may require a steeper learning curve.

Gust

Gust is a cloud-based platform designed to help startups and small businesses streamline their operations, including contract drafting and management. With Gust, users can create custom contracts using pre-built templates and a user-friendly editor. The platform also includes features for document management, such as custom approval workflows and automated notifications. Additionally, Gust includes e-signature capabilities and integration with other business tools, such as PayPal and QuickBooks, to help users manage their contracts within their existing workflow.

One of the main advantages of Gust is its affordability. The platform offers a range of pricing plans, including a free plan with limited features, making it accessible for startups and small businesses with limited budgets. Overall, Gust is a solid option for startups and small businesses looking for an affordable and user-friendly contract drafting and management tool. Its range of features and integration capabilities can help streamline the contract lifecycle, saving time and resources for businesses.

The platform provides a range of tools to help businesses create, manage, and sign contracts quickly and easily. Some of Gust’s key features include:

Customizable templates

Gust provides users with customizable templates for various types of contracts, such as NDAs, employment agreements, and equity plans. Users can modify these templates to fit their specific needs and requirements, making the contract drafting process faster and more efficient.

User-friendly editor

Gust’s editor is user-friendly and easy to use, with a drag-and-drop interface that allows users to add and remove clauses, sections, and other elements with ease. The editor also includes formatting tools, such as font styles and colors, to help users create professional-looking contracts.

Document management

Gust provides tools for managing the entire contract lifecycle, from creation to execution to storage. Users can track the status of their contracts in real time and receive automated reminders for important dates, such as renewal or expiration dates.

E-signature capabilities

Gust includes e-signature capabilities, allowing users to sign and execute contracts electronically. The platform also provides audit trails and other security features to ensure that signed contracts are legally binding and enforceable.

Integration with other business tools

Gust integrates with other popular business tools, such as PayPal and QuickBooks, to help users manage their contracts within their existing workflow. This can save time and reduce the risk of errors or duplication.

Factors to consider when choosing a SaaS contract writing provider

Factors to consider when choosing a SaaS contract writing provider

When choosing a SaaS contract writing provider, it’s essential to consider several factors to ensure you select the most suitable provider for your specific needs. Here are some key factors to consider:

Expertise and Reputation

Assess the provider’s expertise in contract writing and their reputation within the industry. Look for providers with experience in SaaS contracts specifically, as they will have a better understanding of the unique nuances and considerations involved in such agreements. Check client testimonials, case studies, and online reviews to gauge their reputation and the quality of their services.

Customizability and Flexibility

Determine the level of customization and flexibility the provider offers. SaaS contracts can vary greatly based on business models, pricing structures, data protection, and other specific requirements. Ensure the provider can accommodate your unique needs and has the capability to draft contracts that align with your business objectives.

Compliance and Legal Expertise

Verify that the provider has a strong understanding of relevant laws and regulations governing SaaS agreements, such as data privacy, intellectual property, and consumer protection laws. Compliance is critical to avoid legal issues and protect your business interests. Consider whether the provider has legal experts on their team or partnerships with legal professionals to ensure the contracts they draft are legally sound.

Security and Data Protection

SaaS contracts often involve the handling of sensitive data and intellectual property. Evaluate the provider’s security measures, data protection protocols, and compliance with industry standards, such as GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation). Ensure they have appropriate safeguards in place to protect your confidential information and comply with relevant regulations.

Integration and Collaboration

Consider the provider’s ability to integrate with your existing systems and workflows. Seamless integration can enhance efficiency and streamline the contract management process. Additionally, evaluate the provider’s collaboration features, such as document sharing, version control, and collaboration workflows. These features can facilitate collaboration between stakeholders during contract creation and review.

Pricing and Scalability

Understand the pricing structure of the provider and whether it aligns with your budget and anticipated usage. Consider whether they offer scalable options to accommodate your future growth and changing contract needs. Be aware of any additional costs associated with support, upgrades, or customization.

Customer Support and Service Level Agreement (SLA)

Evaluate the level of customer support provided by the provider. Look for providers with responsive support channels and clear service level agreements. Prompt and reliable support can be crucial when issues or questions arise during the contract writing or management process.

Ease of Use and User Experience

Consider the user-friendliness of the provider’s platform or tools. A user-friendly interface and intuitive features can make the contract writing and management process more efficient and accessible for all stakeholders involved.

By considering these factors, you can choose a SaaS contract writing provider that aligns with your specific requirements, enhances your contract management capabilities, and provides the necessary expertise and support to ensure the successful creation of legally sound and effective SaaS agreements.

Is Chat-GPT the future of contract drafting?

ChatGPT and other similar AI language models have the potential to revolutionize many areas of business, including contract drafting. However, it is unlikely that they will replace human lawyers and contract drafters entirely.

While AI language models can provide suggestions and recommendations for contract clauses based on data and previous contracts, they lack the expertise and judgment that experienced human lawyers bring to the table. Contract drafting is a complex and nuanced process that requires not only a deep understanding of the law but also an ability to negotiate and communicate effectively with other parties.

Furthermore, the use of AI language models in contract drafting raises several legal and ethical concerns, such as the potential for bias and errors in the algorithm, as well as issues surrounding the ownership and control of the resulting contracts.

That being said, AI language models can be a useful tool for contract drafters and lawyers, providing them with suggestions and automating routine tasks. As technology continues to improve and evolve, we may see more widespread use of AI language models in contract drafting, but they are unlikely to replace human expertise entirely.