Four Ways to Respond When Monitoring Patent Applications


Whether you have just filed a patent application, or you’re monitoring an existing one, you need to respond quickly to keep the process moving forward. There are four ways to respond when monitoring a patent application: Limit the scope of your monitoring, respond to a final Office action, expiry-based monitoring, and legal status monitoring. These methods will help you get your process back on track.

Legal status monitoring

Using Patent Monitoring can help you understand the state of art and future trends in your field of innovation. It can also alert you to any infringing activities. With active patent monitoring, you can get ahead of the competition and prepare yourself for patent infringement claims. This means that you can develop your invalidity opinion, and you will be able to assess the impact of your competitor’s pending patent grant.

You can use an advanced patent monitoring system to receive the latest updates on USPTO applications. It can be delivered to your inbox, and you can monitor changes to your entire patent family, as well as individual applications. This helps you advance through the prosecution process more quickly.

You can configure the alerts to run on a weekly, bi-weekly, or monthly basis. You can also send the alerts to one or more recipients. You can customize the email template, and the country code, if needed.

You can configure the alerts to notify you of the status change of the patent, when it is withdrawn, granted, or when a new owner is registered. The system also notifies you when an opposition is filed.

Legal StatusTracker is a global alerting service. It provides automatic email notifications and simplifies the patent checking processes for teams. It tracks changes published to multiple sources, including the European Patent Office’s INPADOC database.

You can set up an alert on a specific patent, and then choose how often to receive the alert. You can specify whether you want to receive the alerts via email or on the Internet. You can also select which patents to include in the alerts. You can also set up a sub-account. This allows you to track the cost of the alerts, and to organize them. You can also select a country to monitor, and you can set up an alert for all applications in that country.

The USPTO offers a Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) service in the public domain. It performs searches on published and issued patents, and it is available in both the public and private domains.

Expiry-based monitoring

Using a patent monitoring system is a great way to stay ahead of the competition. If you are able to spot the patents that your competitors might be filing, you will be able to get in front of their lawsuits. You may even be able to develop an invalidity opinion about a competitor’s pending patent application. This can be useful for research and development, as well as commercialization.

The Patent Office has a slew of tools for monitoring patent applications. These include patent applications, the patent application number, and the filing date. The patent application number is based on the type of patent application being filed. You can also check the expiry date of a patent. If it is expired, the patent remains a valid prior-art reference.

The Patent Office also offers a Patent Monitoring program, which allows you to monitor a competitor’s pending patent applications. This is a long-term search, so it is best done at regular intervals. This is an effective tool for identifying abandoned and expired patents, as well as patents that are safe to use. You can also use the Patent Monitoring system to identify inventions that are soon to enter the public domain.

A patent monitoring system may also alert you to important legal events that relate to your patents, such as filings in high courts or the filing of infringement suits. These legal events may have a big impact on your patent’s future.

In addition to providing patent monitoring, an advanced patent monitoring system can also provide USPTO application updates, notify you of changes in your patent’s maintenance status, and even deliver updates to your inbox. With an advanced system, you will have all of the information you need to make informed decisions about your patent portfolio. The most important part of this system is that it will allow you to be in the know about all of your patents’ pending applications.

While there are many other patent monitoring systems on the market, the PAIR Watch system has all of the components you need to effectively and efficiently manage your patent portfolio. This is a highly dependable service that will take all of the guesswork out of the patent monitoring process.

Limiting application to single invention or embodiment

Having a database of patent applications at your disposal is a boon. The first step in analyzing the merits of any given patent application is to narrow down the list of eligible candidates. This can be a tedious task and is best done by a well informed and unbiased third party. This allows for the sifting out of the truly worthy candidates from the pixie dust. Luckily, there are software tools that can help ensure a more thorough and unbiased screening of all eligible applicants.

One such software application is PatentReviewer, a patent monitoring and review platform built for SMEs. In addition to monitoring patent applications, the system can also be used to perform the more mundane tasks, such as determining which claims are valid and invalid, evaluating patent validity and assessing licensing opportunities. This may sound like a daunting task but it can be accomplished with a little time and patience. Using the system, SMEs can be assured of their patent validity and save the time and money of a costly lawyer. The system is capable of identifying patents by application, type, title and date of filing and can even identify infringing patents before they are awarded. Its patent searching capabilities are augmented by the ability to search for extrinsic evidence, such as references to patents, and citations to relevant portions of the specification. In addition, the database can be accessed via a mobile device, ensuring that SMEs are kept in the loop. Its features are well suited to the demands of SMEs and can be customised to meet individual needs.

Responding to a final Office action

Having a thorough understanding of responding to a final Office action when monitoring patent applications can help your company move forward more quickly. It is important to know what a Final Trademark Office Action is, why it is issued, and what to expect. There are two options when dealing with a Final Trademark Office Action.

The first option is to respond to the Office action by filing a Request for Reconsideration. The latter option is to appeal the Office action. This is typically the last opportunity to address legal issues.

An Office Action is a written communication from the Patent Office. It will typically include the grounds of rejection. It will also provide a summary of the conclusions of the Patent Examiner. It will usually set a short response period. Most Office actions must be responded to within six months from the mailing date.

The cost of responding to an Office Action is dependent on the nature of the Office Action. The cost may be as low as several hundred dollars or as high as a few thousand dollars. The fee depends on the number of claims filed, the number of pages of specification, and the size of the applicant.

If an applicant does not respond to an Office Action, the application is considered abandoned. The USPTO can raise procedural and substantive issues that must be addressed in the reply. If the reply is not received by the statutory deadline, the applicant’s application will be abandoned.

When responding to an Office Action, an applicant will be expected to address any objections raised by the Patent Examiner. The most common Office Actions include claim rejections, but there are other types of Office Actions.

The examiner will be able to raise issues related to patentability, such as omnibus claims, abstract claims, and descriptiveness rejections. These Office Actions are often more complex than other types, and require the applicant to make simple amendments.

The most complex Office Actions are based on a likelihood of confusion rejection, or a descriptiveness rejection. When responding to a non-final Office Action, an applicant can either file an Amendment or a Request for Reconsideration.