99 Ways to Get Your Software Patent in View of the Alice Decision

Introduction

Software patents are often sought by companies to protect their intellectual property (IP) and technological inventions. They also confirm the technology’s value. Although pandemic-driven uncertainty reduced initial filings at the United States Patent and Trademark Office, a growing digital economy offers innovators opportunities to claim their IP.

Many companies, particularly software companies, seek patents to protect new inventions and to secure the exclusive right to use and sell their proprietary technology. Companies can obtain a “patent-pending” status during the multiyear process. This is useful for marketing and attracting investor attention. Patents pending are a sign of the uniqueness of an idea and can help to distinguish you in a highly competitive field. The novelty and depth of your resources are showcased by securing software patents.

The Alice Decision and Impact on Software Patenting

The Alice decision by the US Supreme Court has been problematic for software because it established a new standard for patentability that made it more difficult for software patents to be granted. The decision held that abstract ideas implemented using a computer are not patentable, and that merely applying a well-known business practice to a computer system is not enough to make the invention patentable.

The problem with this decision is that it has left many software inventions in a gray area, where it is unclear whether they are patentable or not. The line between an abstract idea and a concrete software invention is often blurry, and this has created uncertainty and inconsistency in the patent system.

Furthermore, the Alice decision has been criticized for its lack of clarity and predictability, which has made it difficult for inventors, patent examiners, and courts to apply the standard consistently. This has resulted in a high level of subjectivity in the patent application process, which has made it more difficult for inventors to obtain patents for their software inventions.

In summary, the Alice decision has created significant challenges for software patents, making it more difficult to obtain patents for software inventions and introducing uncertainty and inconsistency in the patent system.

The Alice patentable subject matter analysis is a two-part test used to determine whether an invention is eligible for patent protection under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The test was established by the US Supreme Court in the 2014 Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International decision.

Keys Steps in the Alice Test

The first step of the Alice test is to determine whether the claimed invention is directed to a patent-ineligible concept, such as an abstract idea, a law of nature, or a natural phenomenon. If the answer to this question is yes, the second step of the test is to determine whether the claimed invention contains an inventive concept that transforms the patent-ineligible concept into a patent-eligible application.

The second step of the Alice test requires an analysis of whether the claims include an element or combination of elements that is sufficient to ensure that the patent in practice amounts to significantly more than a patent upon the ineligible concept itself. This can involve looking at factors such as whether the claimed invention involves a new and useful application of the abstract idea, whether it adds significantly more to the abstract idea beyond well-understood, routine, or conventional activity, and whether the claimed invention includes an inventive concept that transforms the abstract idea into a practical application.

The purpose of the Alice test is to ensure that patents are granted only for inventions that are genuinely novel, non-obvious, and useful, and that are not simply attempts to monopolize an abstract idea. However, the application of the Alice test has been criticized for its lack of clarity and predictability, which has made it difficult for inventors and patent examiners to apply the standard consistently.

How to Beat Alice

While there is no definitive or exhaustive list of ways to “beat Alice,” here are some potential strategies that inventors and patent attorneys may use to increase the chances of getting a patent granted:

1. Focus on a specific technical improvement or innovation, rather than a broad or abstract idea.
2. Include specific and detailed technical descriptions and examples in the patent application.
3. Emphasize the practical applications and benefits of the invention, rather than its theoretical or abstract qualities.
4. Use technical language and terminology that is specific and precise.
5. Limit the scope of the claims to the specific and practical features of the invention.
6. Provide evidence of the real-world use and effectiveness of the invention.
7. Emphasize the technical challenges and difficulties that the invention addresses or overcomes.
8. Conduct a thorough prior art search to identify and distinguish the invention from existing technologies.
9. Include data and experimental results that demonstrate the effectiveness and usefulness of the invention.
10. Focus on the specific technical details of the implementation and operation of the invention, rather than its broader conceptual framework.
11. Emphasize the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention, particularly in comparison to existing technologies.
12. Describe the specific technical problem or need that the invention addresses or solves.
13. Demonstrate how the invention improves or enhances an existing technical process or system.
14. Use clear and concise language in the patent application, avoiding overly complex or abstract language.
15. Provide detailed drawings, diagrams, and flowcharts that illustrate the technical implementation and operation of the invention.
16. Describe the specific technical functions and operations of the invention, as well as its overall purpose and goals.
17. Use language and terminology that is specific to the relevant technical field or industry.
18. Provide concrete examples of how the invention can be used or applied in specific technical contexts or applications.
19. Limit the scope of the claims to specific and tangible technical features and processes.
20. Describe the specific technical methods and techniques used to implement the invention.
21. Provide a detailed and specific technical description of the invention, rather than a more general or abstract conceptual description.
22. Include expert testimony or opinions from technical experts in the relevant field or industry.
23. Focus on the specific technical advantages and benefits of the invention, rather than more general or abstract benefits.
24. Use clear and concise language to describe the technical operation and implementation of the invention.
25. Use specific technical examples and scenarios to demonstrate the practical application and usefulness of the invention.
26. Include specific technical details about the implementation and operation of the invention, including algorithms, code, and software modules.
27. Emphasize the unique and non-obvious aspects of the invention, particularly in comparison to existing technologies.
28. Provide specific technical details about the hardware and software used to implement the invention.
29. Limit the scope of the claims to specific and tangible technical features and processes, rather than more abstract or theoretical concepts.
30. Use language and terminology that is consistent with the technical field or industry in which the invention operates.
31. Describe the specific technical problem or need that the invention addresses or solves, in specific and practical terms.
32. Provide data and experimental results that demonstrate the effectiveness and usefulness of the invention in specific technical contexts or applications.
33. Describe the specific technical functions and operations of the invention, as well as its overall purpose and goals, in specific and practical terms.
34. Provide detailed technical specifications and requirements for the hardware and software used to implement the invention.
35. Use clear and concise language to describe the specific technical operations and methods used to implement the invention.
36. Emphasize the specific and practical benefits and advantages of the invention.

37. Provide a detailed and specific technical description of the invention’s operation, including inputs, outputs, and intermediate steps.
38. Use specific examples and scenarios to demonstrate the practical application and usefulness of the invention, in specific technical contexts or applications.
39. Provide a detailed and specific technical explanation of the unique and non-obvious aspects of the invention, including specific technical challenges and difficulties that the invention overcomes.
40. Use clear and concise language to describe the specific technical operations and methods used to implement the invention, avoiding overly abstract or theoretical language.
41. Describe the specific technical methods and techniques used to implement the invention, in detail and with technical precision.
42. Provide data and experimental results that demonstrate the effectiveness and usefulness of the invention, in specific technical contexts or applications.
43. Emphasize the specific and practical benefits and advantages of the invention over existing technologies, in specific technical contexts or applications.
44. Use clear and concise language to describe the specific technical features and processes of the invention, avoiding overly broad or abstract language.
45. Provide a detailed and specific technical explanation of the specific technical problem or need that the invention addresses or solves.
46. Use concrete technical examples and scenarios to demonstrate the practical application and usefulness of the invention.
47. Use language and terminology that is consistent with the technical field or industry in which the invention operates, avoiding generic or non-specific language.
48. Emphasize the specific and practical technical innovations of the invention, rather than more abstract or theoretical qualities.
49. Use specific technical details to distinguish the invention from existing technologies and prior art.
50. Limit the scope of the claims to specific and tangible technical features and processes, avoiding overly broad or abstract claims.
51. Provide specific technical details about the hardware and software used to implement the invention, including algorithms, code, and software modules.
52. Emphasize the technical challenges and difficulties that the invention addresses or overcomes, in specific and practical terms.
53. Provide specific technical examples of how the invention can be used or applied in specific technical contexts or applications, avoiding generic or non-specific examples.
54. Describe the specific technical benefits and advantages of the invention, in specific and practical terms.
55. Use specific technical language and terminology to describe the technical details and operations of the invention, avoiding generic or non-specific language.
56. Provide a detailed and specific technical explanation of the unique and non-obvious aspects of the invention, including specific technical challenges and difficulties that the invention overcomes.
57. Use data and experimental results to demonstrate the effectiveness and usefulness of the invention in specific technical contexts or applications.
58. Emphasize the specific technical improvements and innovations of the invention, in specific and practical terms.
59. Use specific technical details to distinguish the invention from existing technologies and prior art, in specific and practical terms.
60. Limit the scope of the claims to specific and tangible technical features and processes, avoiding overly broad or abstract claims.
61. Provide a detailed and specific technical description of the implementation and operation of the invention, including inputs, outputs, and intermediate steps.
62. Use specific technical examples and scenarios to demonstrate the practical application and usefulness of the invention in specific technical contexts or applications.
63. Use clear and concise language to describe the specific technical operations and methods used to implement the invention, avoiding overly abstract or theoretical language.
64. Provide data and experimental results that demonstrate the effectiveness and usefulness of the invention, in specific technical contexts or applications.
65. Emphasize the specific and practical benefits and advantages of the invention over existing technologies, in specific technical contexts or applications.
66. Use language and terminology that is consistent with the technical field or industry in which the invention operates, avoiding generic or non-specific language.
67. Emphasize the specific and practicality of the heart of the invention and how it accelerates processor output quality or speed.

68. technical innovations of the invention, rather than more abstract or theoretical qualities.
69. Use specific technical details to distinguish the invention from existing technologies and prior art, in specific and practical terms.
70. Provide a detailed and specific technical explanation of the specific technical problem or need that the invention addresses or solves.
71. Use concrete technical examples and scenarios to demonstrate the practical application and usefulness of the invention.
72. Use language and terminology that is consistent with the technical field or industry in which the invention operates, avoiding generic or non-specific language.
73. Provide specific technical details about the hardware and software used to implement the invention, including algorithms, code, and software modules.
74. Emphasize the technical challenges and difficulties that the invention addresses or overcomes, in specific and practical terms.
75. Provide specific technical examples of how the invention can be used or applied in specific technical contexts or applications, avoiding generic or non-specific examples.
76. Describe the specific technical benefits and advantages of the invention, in specific and practical terms.
77. Use specific technical language and terminology to describe the technical details and operations of the invention, avoiding generic or non-specific language.
78. Provide a detailed and specific technical explanation of the unique and non-obvious aspects of the invention, including specific technical challenges and difficulties that the invention overcomes.
79. Use data and experimental results to demonstrate the effectiveness and usefulness of the invention in specific technical contexts or applications.
80. Emphasize the specific technical improvements and innovations of the invention, in specific and practical terms.
81. Use specific technical details to distinguish the invention from existing technologies and prior art, in specific and practical terms.
82. Limit the scope of the claims to specific and tangible technical features and processes, avoiding overly broad or abstract claims.
83. Provide a detailed and specific technical description of the implementation and operation of the invention, including inputs, outputs, and intermediate steps.
84. Use specific technical examples and scenarios to demonstrate the practical application and usefulness of the invention in specific technical contexts or applications.
85. Use clear and concise language to describe the specific technical operations and methods used to implement the invention, avoiding overly abstract or theoretical language.
86. Provide data and experimental results that demonstrate the effectiveness and usefulness of the invention, in specific technical contexts or applications.
87. Emphasize the specific and practical benefits and advantages of the invention over existing technologies, in specific technical contexts or applications.
88. Use language and terminology that is consistent with the technical field or industry in which the invention operates, avoiding generic or non-specific language.
89. Emphasize the specific and practical technical innovations of the invention, rather than more abstract or theoretical qualities.
90. Use specific technical details to distinguish the invention from existing technologies and prior art, in specific and practical terms.
91. Provide a detailed and specific technical explanation of the specific technical problem or need that the invention addresses or solves.
92. Use concrete technical examples and scenarios to demonstrate the practical application and usefulness of the invention.
93. Use language and terminology that is consistent with the technical field or industry in which the invention operates, avoiding generic or non-specific language.
94. Provide specific technical details about the hardware and software used to implement the invention, including algorithms, code, and software modules.
95. Emphasize the technical challenges and difficulties that the invention addresses or overcomes, in specific and practical terms.
96. Provide specific technical examples of how the invention can be used or applied in specific technical contexts or applications, avoiding generic or non-specific examples.
97. Describe the specific technical benefits and advantages of the invention, in specific and practical terms.
98. Use specific technical language and terminology to describe the technical details and operations of the invention, avoiding generic or non-specific language.
99. Provide a detailed and specific technical explanation of the uniqueness of each feature of the claimed invention.

Overall, software patents can be valuable for protecting and monetizing new and innovative technologies, promoting innovation and investment, and establishing a strategic advantage in the marketplace. However, it’s important to note that the value of a software patent can vary depending on the nature of the invention, the competitive landscape, and other factors. It’s always a good idea to consult with a patent attorney or other legal expert to determine the potential value of a software patent for a particular invention or company.